Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is fighting “environmental racism.”

According to a post to her campaign website on Tuesday, “This small detail in Hillary Clinton’s plan could save lives.”

Meanwhile, people are actually dying right now in Charlotte, North Carolina amid ongoing race riots.

Clinton is playing off the water crisis in Flint, Michigan to court voters concerned about the impact of pollution and other environmental problems on minority communities, which she contends are at much higher risk than whites.

According to HillaryClinton.com:

Whether it’s the level of lead in the drinking water in Flint, Michigan, the number of mental health facilities in Iowa, or the cost of prescription drugs, Hillary knows that “it’s not just a detail if it’s your kid, if it’s your family. It’s a big deal. And it should be a big deal to your president.”

The post goes on to allege that minority children are at much higher risk of exposure to cancer-causing chemicals, smog, and other poisons, though it cites very few statistics to back up the claim. The claims are similar to ones she made when discussing “environmental justice” during a speech to a convention of Rev. Al Sharpton’s National Action Network in Manhattan this spring, Politico reports.

The Clinton website states plainly that “Children of color are more likely to be exposed to toxins than white children,” and that “the impacts of climate change disproportionately affect low-income and minority communities who have the fewest resources to prepare,” but does not cite a source for the information.

The campaign does, however, cite the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Minority Health to substantiate the claim that black children are more likely to suffer from asthma than white kids, and more likely to be hospitalized as a result.

Of course, Clinton has a plan of action to address what she describes as “environmental and climate justice,” which involves expanding on President Obama’s “Clean Power Plan,” expanding solar power, a “$275 billion investment in infrastructure,” and the establishment of a “Presidential Commission on Childhood Lead Exposure.”

Clinton also wants to aggressively prosecute people who expose minorities to “environmental harm,” though she does not go into detail about what that means.

The Clinton Campaign is also touting the former first lady’s alleged efforts “to protect children and families from environmental health hazards, especially those that disproportionately affect low-income communities of color.”

“During law school, Hillary took a summer job researching the education and health of migrant farmworkers and their children,” according to the Clinton website. “As first lady, Hillary helped draw attention to the links between air pollution and children’s asthma.”

Clinton elaborated on her “environmental justice” plan in an earlier Factsheet on the campaign website in which she explained that fixing the problem will not only take a lot of money, it will require the government to crack down on “coal communities” and oil production while offering top-paying unionized jobs for minority workers to gain a foothold in “clean energy” sectors.

“Clinton will also work to expand good-paying job opportunities for people of color throughout the clean energy economy and support prevailing wage and project labor agreements for new infrastructure that utilize skilled labor and help recruit and train workers from communities most heavily impacted by pollution. In today’s economy, African Americans hold only 1.1 percent of energy jobs and receive only 0.01 percent of energy sector profits. This must change in the clean energy economy we build for the future,” according to the site.

Much of Clinton’s proposed “environmental justice” would be carried out by a beefed up Environmental Protection Agency in collaboration with the Justice Department.

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, by contrast, has expressed skepticism about global warming and has called for curbing the powers of the EPA to enact unnecessary regulations.

“Environmental Protection, what they do is a disgrace,” Trump said in October, according to TalkingPointsMemo. “Every week they come out with new regulations. They’re making it impossible. …”

Trump stopped short of promising to eliminate the EPA entirely.

“We can leave a little bit, but you can’t destroy businesses,” he said.