Did the UK Daily Mail airbrush the recent photo of Hillary Clinton making her look more “youthful”?

The news site published this photo of the failed 2016 presidential candidate, leading some to speculate that she got some work done in preparation for a 2020 candidacy:

The site reported:

Hillary Clinton looked wonderfully youthful at an event on Broadway in New York last night – and aesthetic experts suggest it could be down to regular ‘tweakments’ and cosmetic procedures.

The radiant former First Lady, 72, showed off a wrinkle-free complexion and plumped-up cheeks as she joined her husband Bill behind the scenes of Ain’t Too Proud: The Temptations Musical at The Imperial Theatre. …

Her glowing skin was noticeably smoother and her cheeks more defined than earlier in the week, when she spoke at the Jewish Labor Committee’s Annual Human Rights Awards Dinner in the city on Monday.

“Aesthetic expert” Dr. Ross Perry speculated to the site that the difference in Hillary could “be a result of Botox, injectable dermal fillers and Blepharoplasty.”

Here it is zoomed in:

But a video tweeted by the official account of “Ain’t Too Proud,” the production the Clintons saw that night, shows the pair backstage, and Hillary with her normal “baggy” appearance:

The video features several quick cuts of the Clintons, but more than one shows Hillary with bags under her eyes — features the Daily Mail claims were eliminated.

Did the news site edit the photos for Hillary’s benefit?