Socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders thinks millionaires and billionaires are taking advantage of everyday Americans, and he’s illustrating his point in the most hypocritical way possible: through his own taxes.

The 2020 presidential candidate finally released 10 years of his tax returns on Monday, and the numbers show that not only is Sanders’ anti-capitalist rhetoric very profitable, he contributes far less of his wealth to charity than most Americans in his income bracket.

“.BernieSanders donated only $10,600 to charity in 2016 after earning $1,062,626,” the Daily Caller’s Andrew Kerr posted to Twitter.

Sanders has refused to apologize for capitalizing on his failed presidential bid with multiple book deals that pushed his income from a low of $205,271 in 2014 to over $1 million by 2016, all the while campaigning against the evil rich. In 2017, his income increased to $1,131,925 based on the sale of books that rail against the 1 percent, who Sanders claims aren’t paying their fair share.

Sanders is now firmly among the 1 percent himself, and he’s contributing far less than most in his privileged position. The Economic Policy Institute defines the top 1 percent in the U.S. as a family income of more than $421,000 annually, while the latest IRS data shows Americans earning over $250,000 a year donated an average of $21,365 to charity, according to The Daily Caller.

He also has three homes, including a vacation home on Lake Champlain worth far more than most Americans’ primary residence.

Sanders said in a statement his income shows he’s been “fortunate” but refused to apologize for his apparent hypocrisy during a town hall with Fox News on Monday.

“This year, we had $560,000 in income,” Sanders said, referring to his 2018 tax return. “In my and my wife’s case, I wrote a pretty good book. It was a bestseller, sold all over the world, and we made money. If anyone thinks I should apologize for writing a bestselling book, I’m sorry, I’m not gonna do it.”

Sanders’ salary peaked in 2017, as did his charitable giving, with more than $36,000 – or just over 3 percent of his $1.1 million income. But some are questioning whether the 2017 giving was legit, or whether it was another ploy to leverage Sanders’ political stardom into a family business.

The Associated Press reports:

Sanders and his wife disclosed $36,300 in charitable contributions in 2017, but their return does not detail each individual contribution. That same year, the couple announced publicly that they had donated $25,000 as a grant to launch the Sanders Institute, a nonprofit educational organization aligned with the senator’s political and ideological interests.

Jane Sanders was a co-founder of the nonprofit, along with her son, David Driscoll, who became the institute’s executive director. Sanders and his wife put the institute on hiatus last month amid criticism that the nonprofit blurred lines between family, fundraising and campaigning. Jane Sanders said the nonprofit would cease operations beginning in May “so there could not even be an appearance of impropriety.”

Sanders spokeswoman Arianna Jones touted the senator’s “more than $100,000 to charity” over the last decade and alleged it’s “roughly in line” with the “average rates” in the country.

Fox News’ Bret Baier asked Sanders on Monday whether his taxes prove he’s achieved the American Dream through capitalism, the socialist scoffed at the notion.

“No,” he said with a long pause. “What we want is a country in which everyone has an opportunity. … A lot of people don’t have a college degree. A lot of people are not United States senators.”

He also refused to explain why he doesn’t voluntarily pay a massive 52 percent wealth tax he’s advocated for top earners, though he did acknowledge “you’re going to pay more in taxes” if he’s elected president.

Sanders’ paltry contributions to charity clearly conflict with his rally cries against the rich who don’t pay their fair share, but a Boston College study last year suggests it’s baked into his political ideology.

An analysis of charitable giving and voting patterns in the 2008 and 2012 elections found “the more Republican a county is, the more its residents report charitable contributions, the study found,” according to The New York Times.

“The researchers said this finding fell within the broad political tendencies of traditional Republicans who favor less government intervention and more donations from the private sector to make up for the lack of government assistance,” the news site reports.

The opposite can be said of Sanders.

Bernie and Jane Sanders “believe that while voluntary charitable donations are commendable, they can never replace ongoing public investments in major social programs and services that improve people’s lives.”