The Atlantic magazine is diving deep into understanding why so many people find Hillary Clinton’s voice “annoying” and “irritating.”

The magazine consulted voice experts, ranging from a professor of speech to a voice coach hired by Washington, D.C.’s female elites.

“She is really, really pushing from the throat,” vocal coach Laura Verdun tells the magazine.

“Voice is about finessing the air, not about brute force.”

Amee Shah, an assistant professor at Cleveland State University, conducted an analysis of Clinton’s voice and found her pitch is not necessarily out of the ordinary.

But she believes many people “perceive” her voice to be louder because she often shouts into the microphone, creating the “mic effect.”

“Instead of using diaphragmatic breathing which is deep from within your belly, she tends to use more surface-level breathing using her chest and neck muscles,” according to Shah.

“It looks uncomfortable listening to that and also looking at it.”

The magazine claims “society” “expects” other things in a woman’s voice, such as “softness, breathiness and a slight nasality.”

Writer Olga Khazan’s example was Marilyn Monroe.

Shah believes over time, Clinton’s voice has become “more polished” in an attempt to appeal to more Americans.

That’s why, she believes, Clinton has “done away with some of the folksy character in her speech,” according to the magazine.

“You can be loud, you can have a strong voice, without coming across as aggressive or angry,” Verdun says.

Verdun says if she were to work with Clinton, she would urge her not to use “loudness” as a means to create emphasis, because when everything is loud, listeners can’t discern the point.

At the end of the day, The Atlantic states any criticism of Clinton’s voice is merely sexist because Bernie Sanders was hoarse and yelling and no one ever criticized his speech.