Congressman David Trott came to the conclusion that Loretta Lynch’s testimony was one big waste of time.

Trott’s staff counted up the number of times the attorney general said she couldn’t answer a question or refused to give an “appropriate” response, and they had added up at least 74 instances prior to Trott’s questioning, during a hearing today of the House Judiciary Committee.

“I knew you weren’t going to answer our questions today and I apologize for wasting so much time here because it’s really not been very productive,” Trott said.

“It’s one of two things: Either you’re saying that to avoid the appearance of impropriety in which case you should have recused yourself, or you’re trying to protect Hillary Clinton,” he concluded.

  • AmandaTrebiano

    She’s a lying sack of $HlT just like Obama and Hillary.

  • ltbl123

    Did you notice the placard by AG Lynch’s seat at the hearings? It has the abbreviated prefix HON which for those that think that this might matter it stands for the “HONORABLE”. Can anyone regardless of their political affiliation explain in light of the obfuscation, documented before their very eyes, during this interview, how that title (Honorable)could possibly apply to this individual, her superiors, or anyone connected to the current executive branch of government, who serve at the pleasure of this truly DISHONORABLE… president? The apparent majority of citizens who elected this absolutely despicable, treasonous, craven, self absorbed, Marxist, golfer… to the highest office in the land OWE the REST of our NATION an APOLOGY!!! The very least they could do if they had a micro-gram of conscience, reason or personal dignity, is to vote against HIS CRIMINAL REPLACEMENT!!! Ultimately when a government becomes so incredibly corrupt, as we are currently witnessing, and the checks and balances of law are being violated with impunity…the burden falls on us as voters to remove them from office. Will you dear voter at least discriminate between a lawful citizen and a CRIMINAL when you vote???

  • Adm Tech

    Google has just released the Loretta Lynch Universal Translator, it just says “I’m a lying piece of sh*t.” over and over again.

  • Suzette

    I smell corruption as usual. When is it that we American people going to march to see our families United. At this point are families are screwed. God help us all.

  • L Garou

    Another affirmative action dud.
    Just like her mediocre at best, boss.

  • Jantavious

    Treason

  • hadenough57

    Remember, the republicans signed off on Lynch’s confirmation. The republicans questioning Lynch is just a dog and pony show for the masses. At the end of the day, the only thing that will be achieved, is more money removed from the tax payers pocket.

    • The Dems refuse to answer, the GOPe get to show their constituents how hard they’re fighting…
      for re-election.

  • Milly Vanilly

    She refused to answer 74 questions…..What is even more astounding is that there were only 73 questions asked….LOL
    One questions was can you please state your name & title for the record..
    She is SUCH a PAID OFF TREASONOUS MUPPET.
    (If you read the above, please be advised it comes with legal issuance of sarcasm)

  • Watching Lynch testify is psychologically disturbing. The cognitive dissonance could not have been more jarring. Our Attorney General disavowing every rational connection to the corpus of Laws it is her sworn duty to execute!

    It’s essentially the Progressive Declaration of Independence from US Law.

  • She carefully states she has not talked to staff, or any member of any organization “affiliated” with them. Has she talked to anyone “not affiliated” with them?

  • Donald Trump-against-illegal-a

    FBI & DOJ took NO ACTION when my child was kidnapped by an ILLEGAL! http://bit.ly/29DJTqt Will Trump step in?

  • Donald Trump-against-illegal-a

    OPEN LETTER TO RICK SCOTT REGARDING TAX PAYER FUNDED HUMAN TRAFFICKING & CHILD KIDNAPPING http://bit.ly/29lJKSN

  • BIGtimSullivan

    This is really rich coming from Repubs that voted to confirm this little hack. She should have never been confirmed in the first place.

  • CharlieSeattle

    “Either you’re saying that to avoid the appearance of impropriety in which case you should have recused yourself, or you’re trying to protect Hillary Clinton,” he concluded.

    And the bytch is NOT arrested and held in contempt? Why hold the Q&A then?

    First Comey and now Trott are protecting Lynch and Clinton by omission because they are not doing their fukin job.

  • Ronald Fernberg

    We have an Attorney General of the USA, refusing to answer questions from the Congress & this is the person that insures justice for the American people? God help us all!