Slate has been on a rampage against anyone who ask any conspiracy theories about the Clintons, from Hillary’s health to the strange deaths of their associates.

There need to guard the Clintons’ from speculation is typical liberal double standards, because Slate repeatedly held Republicans to feet to the fire about several conspiracy theories and never apologized when they got it wrong.

On August 12, Slate published an article on “The Real Meaning of All Those Right-Wing Conspiracy Theories About Hillary’s Health,” slamming any criticism about the fact that the Democratic nominee is a senior citizen who’s had some odd behavior from coughing fits, to always needing a stool on stage, and wearing a winter’s coat during the summer.

Slate had absolutely no qualms however publishing a piece in 2008 speculating how Sen. John McCain’s brain could be deteriorate from the time of the presidential election till 2016.

Attacking a man is always much easier than even raising questions about a woman to a social justice warrior fueled rag.

There speculation into McCain’s health never ended, while any questions about Hillary are suppressed.

Hillary’s health is not the only time that Slate decided to push left-wing conspiracy theories while slamming any questions imposed by conservative journalists.

Slate slammed WikiLeaks for questioning the murder of Seth Conrad Rich, the 27-year old DNC staffer who was mysteriously murdered with no suspects, witnesses, or motives.

The case is still open and Julian Assange has hinted on Dutch radio that Rich was the DNC leak and offered reward money for anyone who could help find his murdered.

This is another case of Slate’s liberal double standard, while they slammed WikiLeaks for questioning the death of one of their supposed leaks, they had no problem promoting the conspiracy that George W. Bush had a device assisting him underneath his suit during the presidential debate in 2004.