Some low-information voters are so supportive of Hillary, they’ll follow her right into the gates of a third world country.

Several people were recently asked if they supported Hillary Clinton’s “plan” to lower the standard of living and not only did several of them clearly not understand what the phrase meant, but they blindly supported the idea, simply because Hillary was for it.

“I think the standard of living should be lower because I like to go to the bars and drink the alcohol for lower,” one woman said while her friends sought to help her avoid total embarrassment.

They failed.

“Hillary Clinton is obviously promising to lower the standard of living if she’s elected, are you looking forward to that?” man-on-the-street reporter Mark Dice asked. “Yeah,” said another responded.

Another man dismissed the idea, not because it’s bad, but because he thinks Bernie Sanders is going to win the primary and the general elections. He thought the idea “works for her because it fits her personality,” but went on to say, “as an American, I don’t think I can stand behind that, and added he might have to support Donald Trump.

Another respondent confessed she doesn’t “really keep up with that” in regards to the idea.

“Hillary Clinton has promised to lower the standard of living if she gets elected, do you think that’s long overdue?” Dice asked another man.

“Yes. Definitely long overdue,” he answered. After Dice said “lower the standard of living” again, the man caught himself and burst out laughing, seemingly embarrassed he blindly answered the question apparently without really thinking about it.

On the campaign trail, Clinton has only stated that she’ll “raise incomes,” without providing specifics on how she’ll accomplish that.

And when she was asked about the runaway $18 trillion national debt — which continues to rise and arguably risks America’s standard of living — she criticized former President George W. Bush.

At an event in New Hampshire Thursday, Allie Nault, Miss America’s Outstanding Teen 2016, said she’s asking all the presidential candidates what they’re doing about America’s $18 trillion debt.

“Specifically, what will you do?” to tackle it, she asked the candidate.

“Let’s have a little historic context here,” Clinton responded. “When my husband left the White House, we had a balanced budget and a surplus and if we had stayed on a responsible fiscal path, we could of had we chosen, paid off our entire national debt.

“Unfortunately that was not the path selected by then President George W. Bush where he slashed taxes for the wealthy, he waged two wars without raising a penny to pay for them, the first time in American history that happened. And took his eyes off the financial markets and the mortgage markets and we know what happened and we fell into a great recession and it required spending money as you often have to in times of great economic contraction to be able to keep the economy going to to try to get it back on track.

“And indeed now our economy is going again. Our deficit is shrinking but we are left with this large national debt,” she said.

“So I think we should get back to sensible economic policies that put people to work, raise incomes and begin to lower our national debt.”