Renowned academic feminist Camille Paglia dismisses the notion that electing Hillary Clinton as the first woman President of the United States would be a good thing for women.

Clinton, Paglia argues, is “a disaster!”

“It is an outrage how she’s played the gender card. She is a woman without accomplishment,” Paglia, a fixture at the University of the Arts in Philadelphia, told The Spectator. “’I sponsored or co-sponsored 400 bills.’ Oh really? These were bills to rename bridges and so forth. And the things she has accomplished have been like the destabilization of North Africa, causing refugees to flood into Italy … The woman is a disaster!”

Paglia explained that she once supported the Clintons, but changed her tune after President Bill Clinton was busted in his sexual escapades with Monica Lewinsky and witnessing the Clinton clan attack her for speaking out.

“One of the first interviews I did here – the headline was ‘Kind of a bitch – why I like Hillary Clinton.’ My jaundiced view of her is entirely the result of observing her behavior. And last election, I voted for Jill Stein’s Green party. So I have already voted for a woman president,” Paglia said.

Paglia, who promotes a “street-smart Amazon feminism” that focuses on self-reliance and self-protection instead of “cosseted, indulged and protected from every evil” brand of feminism infecting college campuses, elaborated further on what a President Hillary Clinton might mean for American women.

“If Hillary wins, nothing will change. She knows the bureaucracy, all the offices of government and that’s what she likes to do, sit behind the scenes and manipulate the levers of power,” Paglia told The Spectator.

She also gave her two cents about Donald Trump, and his millions of supporters.

“ … People want change and they’re sick of the establishment – so you get this great popular surge … This idea that Trump represents such a threat to western civilization – it’s often predicted about presidents and nothing ever happens – yet if Trump wins it would be an amazing moment of change because it would destroy the power structure of the Republican party, the power structure of the Democratic party and destroy the power of the media,” Paglia said.

“It would be an incredible release of energy … at a moment of international tension and crisis.”

The Spectator interview was certainly not the first time Paglia spoke candidly about the election, and Clinton’s corruption.

In an on-camera interview with Sp!ked this spring, the 69-year-old described Hillary Clinton as soulless, incompetent and “utterly corrupt.”

“I feel that Hillary Clinton is utterly corrupt. I feel that her current positions on the campaign trail have just been co-opted from what Bernie Sanders was saying because her poll testing told her that’s where the party was,” Paglia said.

“So I think she’s absolutely soulless. I think she’s incompetent,” she added.

Paglia pointed out in the interview that several other women would make a much better first woman president and that none of them have come forward to pursue the opportunity.

She elaborated on why that might be during her talk with The Spectator this week.

“In order to run for president of the United States, you have to spend two or three years of your life out on the road constantly asking for money and most women find that life too harsh, too draining,” she said. “That is why we haven’t had a women president of the United States – not because we haven’t been ready for one, for heaven’s sakes, for a very long time …”